<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transformers: Revenge of the Foul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showbits.net/2009/06/18/transformers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showbits.net/2009/06/18/transformers-2/</link>
	<description>A blog of news, reviews, commentary, and quirks from Hollywood and Broadway, with a focus on quirky, geeky stuff like Star Wars, Star Trek, and superheroes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maginnis</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2009/06/18/transformers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9000</link>
		<dc:creator>maginnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=474#comment-9000</guid>
		<description>And &lt;a href=&quot;http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=415826&amp;$affid=100055&amp;$ocid=MSNToolbar130&amp;ppud=4&amp;&quot; title=&quot;&#039;Transformers 3&#039;? LaBeouf says it&#039;ll be darker - MSN Movies News&quot;&gt;they&#039;re already talking about a third installment&lt;/a&gt;.

Although, Bay has been quoted as saying he&#039;s not interested in doing any more &lt;em&gt;Transformers&lt;/em&gt; films.  So maybe the next won&#039;t be so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And <a href="http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=415826&#038;$affid=100055&#038;$ocid=MSNToolbar130&#038;ppud=4&#038;" title="'Transformers 3'? LaBeouf says it'll be darker - MSN Movies News">they&#039;re already talking about a third installment</a>.</p>
<p>Although, Bay has been quoted as saying he&#039;s not interested in doing any more <em>Transformers</em> films.  So maybe the next won&#039;t be so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Gagne</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2009/06/18/transformers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=474#comment-8990</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3605/3633752862_d2a463fdca_o.jpg&quot;&gt;the most depressing photograph ever&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/blakespot/status/2271288965&quot; title=&quot;Twitter / Blake Patterson: &quot;Most depressing photograp ...&quot;&gt;Blake Patterson&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s &#034;<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3605/3633752862_d2a463fdca_o.jpg">the most depressing photograph ever</a>&#034;, according to <a href="http://twitter.com/blakespot/status/2271288965" title="Twitter / Blake Patterson: &quot;Most depressing photograp ...">Blake Patterson</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Gagne</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2009/06/18/transformers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=474#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/23/review.transformers.revenge/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Review: &#039;Transformers&#039; lands with giant thud - CNN.com&quot;&gt;CNN doesn&#039;t like this movie&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen&lt;/em&gt; &#8212; the most terrible revenge since Montezuma&#039;s &#8212; is louder, longer and lamer than the 2007 hit it succeeds.  Which is saying a lot. ... [this film] is a grotesque exercise in hyperinflation. At 149 minutes, it&#039;s longer than &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Close Encounters of the Third Kind&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Star Wars&lt;/em&gt;. In fact, this may be the emptiest epic ever made.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And, encapsulating what I didn&#039;t like about the first film was the continued effort at being a comedy:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Here&#039;s a sample of what Bay throws at the wall in the hope of generating some stray laughs: small dogs humping. Hysterical middle-aged women. Autobots with effeminate voices. A miniature Decepticon dry-humping Fox&#039;s leg. John Turturro improvising. Tasers. A cowardly Latino. A short Arab. Snails. None of these things is funny. Not in this movie, anyway.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The film currently has a 21% rating on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_revenge_of_the_fallen/&quot; title=&quot;Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes&quot;&gt;Rotten Tomatoes&lt;/a&gt;, compared to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_the_movie/&quot; title=&quot;Transformers Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes&quot;&gt;the original&#039;s 57%&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/23/review.transformers.revenge/index.html" title="Review: 'Transformers' lands with giant thud - CNN.com">CNN doesn&#039;t like this movie</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<em>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</em> &mdash; the most terrible revenge since Montezuma&#039;s &mdash; is louder, longer and lamer than the 2007 hit it succeeds.  Which is saying a lot. &#8230; [this film] is a grotesque exercise in hyperinflation. At 149 minutes, it&#039;s longer than <em>2001</em>, <em>Close Encounters of the Third Kind</em> or <em>Star Wars</em>. In fact, this may be the emptiest epic ever made.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And, encapsulating what I didn&#039;t like about the first film was the continued effort at being a comedy:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Here&#039;s a sample of what Bay throws at the wall in the hope of generating some stray laughs: small dogs humping. Hysterical middle-aged women. Autobots with effeminate voices. A miniature Decepticon dry-humping Fox&#039;s leg. John Turturro improvising. Tasers. A cowardly Latino. A short Arab. Snails. None of these things is funny. Not in this movie, anyway.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The film currently has a 21% rating on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_revenge_of_the_fallen/" title="Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, compared to <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_the_movie/" title="Transformers Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes">the original&#039;s 57%</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
