<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Showbits &#187; A-Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/a-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showbits.net</link>
	<description>A blog of news, reviews, commentary, and quirks from Hollywood and Broadway, with a focus on quirky, geeky stuff like Star Wars, Star Trek, and superheroes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The A-Team: Back in Action</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2010/01/21/a-team-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2010/01/21/a-team-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk Benedict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Peppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liam Neeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. T]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Hollywood adapts a television series to film, it&#039;s easy to view the maneuver as an uncreative and desperate attempt to cash in on a well-known brand without any respect for the original property and its fans. From Car 54 and Mod Squad to G.I. Joe and The Transformers, there are myriad examples of stories [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hollywood adapts a television series to film, it&#039;s easy to view the maneuver as an uncreative and desperate attempt to cash in on a well-known brand without any respect for the original property and its fans.  From <em>Car 54</em> and <em>Mod Squad</em> to <em>G.I. Joe</em> and <em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/transformers/" title="Transformers — Showbits">The Transformers</a></em>, there are myriad examples of stories that were best left to the small screen.</p>
<p>But to paint all such adaptations so negatively is to overlook the overwhelming success, both critically and financially, of film such as <a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/serenity/" title="Serenity — Showbits">Serenity</a> and <a href="http://www.showbits.net/2009/05/08/star-trek-movie-review/" title="A New Star Trek for a New Generation — Showbits"><em>Star Trek</em></a>.  Such home runs give us reason for optimism, even if their lackluster counterparts temper that optimism with caution.</p>
<p>I&#039;m therefore ambivalent toward the feature film reboot of <em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/a-team/" title="A-Team — Showbits">The A-Team</a></em>.  The original series, which ran for 98 episodes from 1983 to 1987, had a colorful and recognizable cast that included George Peppard (<em>Breakfast at Tiffany&#039;s</em>), Dirk Benedict (<em>Battlestar Galactica</em>), Dwight Schultz (<em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/tng/" title="TNG — Showbits">Star Trek: The Next Generation</a></em>), and <a href="http://www.mohawkmedia.co.uk/" title="Mohawk Media - The Official Mr. T Website">Mr. T</a> (who <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=61863" title="No Mr. T Cameo in The A-Team - ComingSoon.net">will not appear in the reboot</a>).  It doesn&#039;t seem feasible that any modern studio could recapture that magic.</p>
<p>And yet, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exyzEFrmLuM" title="YouTube - A-Team - Official Teaser Trailer (HD)">the following trailer</a> has me positively giddy:</p>
<pre><center>
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/exyzEFrmLuM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/exyzEFrmLuM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>As <a href="http://daytonward.livejournal.com/434135.html" title="Dayton's Blog: Is that a plan I see coming together?">Dayton Ward said</a>, &#034;Does <a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/liam-neeson/" title="Liam Neeson — Showbits">Liam Neeson</a> look like a dead ringer for George Peppard, or what?&#034;  And it goes beyond just superb casting — the opening dialogue, the music,  the one-liners, and the action all seem lifted right from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MVonyVSQoM" title="YouTube - A-Team Intro High Quality">the original series</a>:</p>
<pre><center>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_MVonyVSQoM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_MVonyVSQoM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>Maybe this studio knows what they&#039;re doing, after all.  We&#039;ll find out on June 11, 2010.</p>
<p>(Hat tip to <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62189" title="The A-Team Trailer Hits! - ComingSoon.net">ComingSoon.net</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2010/01/21/a-team-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Dallas Team: The 1969 Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2009/04/17/star-trek-opening-variations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2009/04/17/star-trek-opening-variations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1969]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilligans Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Blogwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space 1969]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The A Team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In less than a month, Star Trek will see a rebirth. Though initial impressions are positive, there are still fans worried about taking the franchise in a new direction. Change is bad, right? In contrast, I&#039;ve always found Star Trek to be limited in its scope. Why must science fiction be its own genre? Surely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In less than a month, <em>Star Trek</em> will see a rebirth.  Though <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/04/star-treks-snea.html" title="'Star Trek': What people are saying after the surprise screening | PopWatch Blog | EW.com">initial impressions are positive</A>, there are still fans worried about taking the franchise in a new direction.  Change is bad, right?</p>
<p>In contrast, I&#039;ve always found <em>Star Trek</em> to be limited in its scope.  Why must science fiction be its own genre?  Surely <a href="http://www.showbits.net/2008/04/01/april-fools-trek-2005/" title="Showbits - A Fool's Trek"></a>there&#039;s room for <em>Star Trek</em> to explore other styles</em>, such as comedy or murder-mystery.  How about <em>Friends: Ten-Forward</em> or <em>CSI: Cardassia</em>?</p>
<p>Some enterprising (heh) editors are of the same opinion and, as proof of concept, have remodeled <em>Star Trek</em>  after their favorite hits from the past.  What would Kirk and company look like if they composed <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyfhzqhJNbg&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=C2607E06019201E7&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1" title="YouTube - Star Trek as The A-Team">The A-Team</a></em>?</p>
<pre>
<center>
<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WyfhzqhJNbg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WyfhzqhJNbg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>Need less action and a bit more intrigue?  Then try <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QktVh64BYx4&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=C2607E06019201E7&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1" title="YouTube - Star Trek: The Next Generation / Dallas opening theme">Dallas</a></em>:</p>
<pre>
<center>
<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QktVh64BYx4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QktVh64BYx4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>Or, if you prefer something more light-hearted, how about <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H987xPZuD1o&#038;fmt=18&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=C2607E06019201E7&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1" title="YouTube - Voyager Gilligan's Island style">Gilligan&#039;s Island</a></em>?</p>
<pre>
<center>
<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H987xPZuD1o&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1&#038;ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H987xPZuD1o&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1&#038;ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>If, after seeing all these alternatives, you&#039;re still a purist who believes <em>Star Trek</em> belongs firmly in the future, then let us at least return to <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhRGqT31WZg&#038;feature=PlayList&#038;p=C2607E06019201E7&#038;index=0&#038;playnext=1" title="YouTube - Star Trek 1969 Now With Futura!">1969</a></em>, the era in which it was launched:</p>
<pre>
<center>
<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PhRGqT31WZg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PhRGqT31WZg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>(You can also view <a href="http://daytonward.livejournal.com/81267.html" title="Dayton's Blog: A pimple on the ass of the Internet. - Space: 1969, Take 2">a side-by-side comparison of the <em>Star Trek</em> and <em>1969</em> openings</a>.)</p>
<p>So, what do you think&#8230; is there room enough in the world of <em>Star Trek</em> for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C2607E06019201E7" title="YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.">all these genres</a> to get along?</p>
<p>(Hat tips to <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/rms_hates_cloud_computing_says_you_should_too" title="RMS hates cloud computing; says you should too - Computerworld Blogs">IT Blogwatch</a> and <a href="http://daytonward.livejournal.com/80599.html" title="Dayton's Blog: A pimple on the ass of the Internet. - Space: 1969">Dayton Ward</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2009/04/17/star-trek-opening-variations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/20 queries in 0.068 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.showbits.net @ 2012-02-11 02:07:16 -->
