<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Showbits &#187; Spock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/spock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showbits.net</link>
	<description>A blog of news, reviews, commentary, and quirks from Hollywood and Broadway, with a focus on quirky, geeky stuff like Star Wars, Star Trek, and superheroes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Trailer: Past, Present, and Future</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2008/11/17/star-trek-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2008/11/17/star-trek-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paramount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek XI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zachary Quinto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With still six months to go, Star Trek XI has already traveled a long road. The intention to develop the property was announced in April 2006, with the first poster coming out in June of that year. JJ Abrams (Lost, Alias, Mission Impossible III) signed on to direct in February 2007, and filming began in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With still six months to go, <em><a href="http://www.startrekmovie.com/" title="Star Trek | Official Movie Site | In Theaters May 2009 | Star Trek Movie">Star Trek XI</a></em> has already traveled a long road.  The intention to develop the property was <a href="http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=18614" title="Empire: Movie News - It Won't Be Kirk And Spock">announced in April 2006</a>, with <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/mediaview?id=19895" title="STARTREK.COM: Photo">the first poster</a> coming out in June of that year.  JJ Abrams (<em>Lost</em>, <em>Alias</em>, <em>Mission Impossible III</em>) <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/45256.html" title="STARTREK.COM : Article">signed on to direct in February 2007</a>, and <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/2312284.html" title="STARTREK.COM : Article">filming began in November 2007</a>, with a wrap date of March 2008.  The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZiR-NETDr0" title="YouTube - Star Trek XI - Trailer #1 TRUE-HD">film-footage-free teaser trailer</a> was released before <em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/cloverfield/" title="Cloverfield">Cloverfield</a></em> in January 2008, back when we thought we&#039;d be revisiting Roddenberry&#039;s future as early as this Christmas.  </p>
<p>Now, with less than half a year until the May 8th release, the veil of secrecy under which the <em>Star Trek</em> reboot has until recently been conducted provides us with our first significant glimpse of what awaits in the form of <A HREF="http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/" TITLE="Apple - Trailers - Star Trek">this full-length trailer</a>:</p>
<pre>
<center>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/atLsk5clMd4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/atLsk5clMd4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
</center>
</pre>
<p>I was sorely tempted to not indulge in this trailer at all; if its purpose is to sell me on the film, then its very existence is superfluous.  Why not leave that many more surprises until its silver screen debut?</p>
<p>But I&#039;m glad I watched it, and gladder still that it is completely spoiler-free.  Almost nothing of the plot or obstacles are revealed, leaving us instead with a more general look of the actors and their environment.  I confess that even that little is not what I expected.  The Enterprise has always faced the final frontier with a sense of wonderment, though here we find it in not the seasoned and mature crew of <em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/tos/" title="TOS">TOS</a></em>, but a younger and less experienced crew.  As a prequel, that only makes sense, but I worry that too much rebellious angst will fill the film, as suggested by the conflict between Kirk and Spock.  Also, seeing Kirk on two classic means of locomotion lends an even lower-tech feeling than its temporal predecessor, <em><a href="http://www.showbits.net/tag/enterprise/" title="Enterprise">Enterprise</a></em>.</p>
<p>Other than these minor points, I have a surprisingly nondescript reaction.  The fast-paced nature of the trailer left little opportunity to assess the characters in their roles, or even to get a good look at their ship, within or without.  I find myself neither more eager nor more anxious about the fate of the franchise; only the final film will allow me that judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2008/11/17/star-trek-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Gods and Men</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/12/22/of-gods-and-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/12/22/of-gods-and-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christina Moses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanfilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Takei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JG Hertzler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Voyages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of Gods and Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Koenig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Enough and Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/12/22/of-gods-and-men/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article on CNN.com reminded me that the Web holds a bounty of fan films based on the various Star Trek properties. This wasn&#039;t necessarily news to me: I&#039;d once tried watching an episode of New Voyages, which aims to continue the five-year mission of the original Enterprise, but couldn&#039;t get past the recasting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><A HREF = "http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/20/star.trek.podcast/index.html" TITLE="Fans make their own 'Webisodes'">A recent article on CNN.com</A> reminded me that the Web holds a bounty of fan films based on the various <em>Star Trek</em> properties.  This wasn&#039;t necessarily news to me: I&#039;d once tried watching an episode of <A HREF = "http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/" TITLE="Star Trek New Voyages"><em>New Voyages</A></em>, which aims to continue the five-year mission of the original Enterprise, but couldn&#039;t get past the recasting of the original stars.  William Shatner&#039;s portrayal of James T. Kirk was too engrained in my mind for me to accept anyone else in the role; even in science fiction, suspension of disbelief has its limits. </p>
<p>But to see on CNN that <a href="http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/news112607.html" TITLE="New Voyages News">this series won <em>TV Guide</em>&#039;s 2007 Online Video Award for Best Sci-Fi Webisodes</a>, chosen over <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>, suggested I should look again.  I&#039;d thought the only way to watch <em>New Voyages</em> <A HREF = "http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/episodes.html" TITLE="Star Trek New Voyages episode downloads">episodes</a> was via streaming video, which I generally eschew &#8212; but poking around their Web site revealed a slightly preferable <A HREF = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_%28protocol%29" TITLE="BitTorrent on Wikipedia">BitTorrent</A> option.  The episode I selected for our reintroduction was &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/episode_weat.html" TITLE="World Enough and Time">World Enough and Time</A>&#034;, written and directed by Marc Scott Zicree (author of &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/71932.html" TITLE="Far Beyond the Stars">Far Beyond the Stars</A>&#034;, possibly my favorite <em>DS9</em> episode).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/posters.html" title="New Voyages Poster Downloads"><img src="http://www.showbits.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/weat_teaser_poster.thumbnail.jpg" alt="World Enough and Time" align="right"></a>Again, I was assaulted by the casting of anyone but Shatner and Nimoy as Kirk and Spock, but this time I persevered.  I&#039;m glad I did, as even if the actors didn&#039;t nail the parts, I can&#039;t blame the writing, which comes across strongly.  The sets are on par with the original series (which, despite being 40 years later, is pretty good for a fan film &#8212; authentic, too), and the sound effects and CGI are fluidly incorporated.</p>
<p>But the star of the show is none other than George Takei, playing the role of an older Sulu.  Rather than looking out-of-place, this temporal anomaly is written into the story in flawless <em>Trek</em> fashion, in the spirit of &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/100331.html" TITLE="Time's Orphan">Time&#039;s Orphan</a>&#034;.  For this actor to have taken time away from <em><A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=213" TITLE="Heroes for One Season">Heroes</A></em> to so accurately reprise this role for a free Web series speaks volumes of the integrity of both Mr. Takei and <em>New Voyages</em>.  Yet newcomer <A HREF = "http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1920657/" TITLE="Christina Moses on IMDb">Christina Moses</a> almost steals the show, capturing the awe and innocence of a first-time space traveller with earnest mannerisms and subtle body language.  As hard as the recast <em>TOS</em> icons worked, their best role was to frame these two actors&#039; characters and performances.  Altogether, the cast and story made every minute of the one-hour episode worth watching.</p>
<p>Looking through the episode list, it appears <em>New Voyages</em>&#039; other offerings are equally star-studded.  Story authors include David Gerrold (author of &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68744.html" TITLE="The Trouble with Tribbles">The Trouble with Tribbles</A>&#034;) and <A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/creative/bio/3008.html" TITLE="D.C. Fontana">Dorothy Fontana</A> (author of &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68308.html" TITLE="Encounter at Farpoint">Encounter at Farpoint</A>&#034;, &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68778.html" TITLE="The Enterprise Incident">The Enterprise Incident</A>&#034;, and more), while among the actors are Walter Koenig as Pavel Chekhov and <A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=244" TITLE="One Giant Leap for Klingonkind">J.G. Hertzler</A> as <A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/71932.html" TITLE="Harcourt Fenton Mudd">Harry Mudd</A>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.startrekofgodsandmen.com/" TITLE="Star Trek Of Gods and Men"><img src="http://www.showbits.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/1701m_banner.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Of Gods and Men" align="left"></a>The CNN article neglected to make a timely mention of a similar project: <em><A HREF = "http://www.startrekofgodsandmen.com/" TITLE="Star Trek Of Gods and Men">Star Trek: Of Gods and Men</a></em>, which finally debuted today.  This feature-length production can hardly be called a &#034;fan film&#034; when you consider its weighty cast: Walter Koenig (Pavel Chekhov), Nichelle Nichols (Uhura), Grace Lee Whitney (Janice Rand), Lawrence Montaigne (Stonn from &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68728.html" TITLE="Amok Time">Amok Time</A>&#034;), Gary Graham (Ambassador Soval), Alan Ruck (Captain John Harriman), Tim Russ (Tuvok), Ethan Phillips (Neelix), Garrett Wang (Harry Kim), J.G. Hertzler (General Martok), Cirroc Lofton (Jake Sisko), and Chase Masterson (Leeta) &#8212; as well as some alumni you won&#039;t recognize: Crystal Allen (an <em>Enterprise</em> Orion slave girl),  William Wellman (a <em>DS9</em> Bajoran officer), and Daamen Krall (a voice actor for the Star Trek: Starfleet Academy video game).  Even &#034;World Enough and Time&#034;&#039;s Kirk and Spock make appearances in other roles.</p>
<p>This dark, &#034;<A HREF = "http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68432.html" TITLE="Yesterday's Enterprise">Yesterday&#039;s Enterprise</a>&#034;-style mashup is every Trekkie&#039;s dream, though I worried it would&#039;ve suffered from lengthy delays: the film was originally to be released back in April, and even now, only the first third, weighing in at 26 minutes, is available in low-quality streaming video. (Watch for a higher quality version once opening weekend demand dies down.)  But what I&#039;ve seen so far has me eager for more.  These experienced actors are so comfortable in the <em>Trek</em> universe that watching them find new ways to play in it is a win-win for both sides of the camera.</p>
<p>The varying yet surprising quality of these &#034;webisodes&#034; has me looking at J.J. Abrams&#039; pending <em>TOS</em> reboot in a new light.  Both &#034;World Enough and Time&#034; and <em>Of Gods and Men</em> have demonstrated that a tight script and a talented cast can deliver an excellent story, regardless of the characters or the setting.  But when that promise is exemplified best by <em>Star Trek</em> alumni, as is the case with the above two films, the concept of recasting the characters we know and love becomes a questionable proposition at best.  I&#039;m a bit more cautious now about the Christmas 2008 release &#8212; but I now know that, thanks to talented fans and actors, I have a wealth of new adventures to tide me over in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/12/22/of-gods-and-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return to the Forbidden Planet</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/10/06/tos-menagerie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/10/06/tos-menagerie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD-DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menagerie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remastered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/10/06/tos-menagerie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a week of blogging about Star Trek: The Next Generation, you might get the impression it&#039;s my favorite of the Trek series. Even I haven&#039;t decided if that honor belongs to TNG or DS9 &#8212; but definitely not in the running is TOS. That&#039;s not an indictment of the show&#039;s datedness or lack of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After <a href="http://www.showbits.net/tng-20/" title="TNG at 20">a week of blogging about <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em></a>, you might get the impression it&#039;s my favorite of the <em>Trek</em> series.  Even I haven&#039;t decided if that honor belongs to <em>TNG</em> or <em>DS9</em> &#8212; but definitely not in the running is <em>TOS</em>.</p>
<p>That&#039;s not an indictment of the show&#039;s datedness or lack of quality, but more simply a lack of exposure.  <em>The Original Series</em>&#039; debut predates my own by a decade, and since it has the least number of episodes of any <em>Trek</em> series and I cancelled my TV service eight years ago, it&#039;s simply not something I have much opportunity to watch.  But I love the characters and have found that Kirk, Spock, and <a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=54" title="Just an old country doctor...">McCoy make for much more captivating novels</a> than any other crew (especially Voyager&#039;s &#8212; blech).</p>
<p>Now comes the opportunity to watch <em>The Original Series</em> in a way previously afforded to only <em>The Next Generation</em>: on the silver screen.  As a promotion for the November 20th HD-DVD release of <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/store/news/article/2303263.html" title="Star Trek Remastered on HD DVD"><em>Star Trek</em> Remastered</a>, the <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/TOS/article/28095.html" title="Remastering Star Trek">updated</a> &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68692.html" title="Menagerie">Menagerie</a>&#034;, which features footage from the rejected pilot &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68662.html" title="The Cage">The Cage</a>&#034;, will be shown in 300 theaters nationwide the evening of Tuesday, November 13th.  &#034;The two-hour screening includes a special introduction by Eugene &#039;Rod&#039; Roddenberry, son of <em>Star Trek</em> creator Gene Roddenberry, plus an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the making of the Remastered series,&#034; says <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/2308573.html?sssdmh=dm4.228844" title="Remastered 'Menagerie' in Theaters!">StarTrek.com</a>, which has links to both the press release and theater listings. (Yet another tip of the hat to <a href="http://daytonward.livejournal.com/81748.html" title="See the remastered 'The Menagerie' in theaters!">Dayton Ward</a>)</p>
<p>&#034;The Menagerie&#034; is one of the few episodes I have seen of <em>TOS</em>, but not like this.  I already have my tickets and will my calling my father shortly to introduce him to this event, just as he did me to <em>TNG</em> two decades ago.  If you&#039;ve never seen <em>Trek</em> before, this might be the franchise entry point you&#039;ve been looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/10/06/tos-menagerie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TNG at 20: Where, Oh Where, Has My Little Spock Gone?</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/24/tng-20-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/24/tng-20-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peterw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klingon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Next Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG at 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/24/tng-20-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the best of generations, it was the worst of generations. Finally, after so many years, Star Trek was returning to our homes. The excitement was tangible: the teaser clips showed this wonderful (albeit strange-looking) new Enterprise, one that made Kirk&#039;s Enterprise seem like the family runabout. But never mind all that &#8212; it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the best of generations, it was the worst of generations. Finally, after so many years, <em>Star Trek</em> was returning to our homes. The excitement was tangible: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AayLwwvn77s&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eshowbits%2Enet%2F" title="Star Trek TNG promo">the teaser clips</a> showed this wonderful (albeit strange-looking) new <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/ships/article/70381.html" title="NCC-1701D">Enterprise</a>, one that made <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/ships/article/70377.html" title="NCC-1701">Kirk&#039;s Enterprise</a> seem like the family runabout. But never mind all that &#8212; it was <strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong>!</p>
<p>However, not all was breathless anticipation. All our favorite characters were gone. (Or so we thought!) How could it be <em>Star Trek</em> without <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/character/1112508.html" title="Spock">Spock</a>? And what on Earth(!) was this rumor that  a <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/features/specials/article/3881.html" title="Great Klingon moments"><strong><em>Klingon</em></strong></a> was part of the crew!</p>
<p>Nevertheless, when the big night finally arrived, wild horses couldn&#039;t have dragged me away from the TV! In the opening sequence, I mourned the loss of the haunting theme from the original series and groaned at the politically correct change to, &#034;Where no <strong><em>one</em></strong> has gone before&#8230;&#034; And as the episode progressed, my fears deepened as it turned into the type of episode I always liked least &#8212; some omnipotent being (&#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/character/1112478.html" title="Q">Q</a>&#034;) was playing havoc with the laws of time and space. I wanted <strong>science </strong>fiction, not fantasy!</p>
<p>But there were highlights, too. It almost brought tears to my eyes when <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/character/1112499.html" title="Leonard H. McCoy">Admiral McCoy</a> came aboard, providing a physical, connecting link to the past. (Little did we know that Spock and <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/character/1112502.html" title="Montgomery Scott">Scotty</a> would also reappear.) The new Enterprise was a work of art, much more streamlined than the old model (so very important in the vacuum of space&#8230;), though it still suffered from the same inexplicable ability to provide seatbelts for the bridge crew! The computer still had <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/cast/111529.html" title="Majel Barrett">the same wonderful &#034;voice&#034;</a>, another link with the past. The computer consoles were beautiful, as was Counselor Cleavage, err, <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/character/1112460.html" title="Deanna Troi">Troi</a>.</p>
<p>Eventually the episode ended, and for all my misgivings about the changes (<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/character/1112457.html" title="Data">Data</a> was no Spock!), I knew I would be back next week. Well, mostly. I&#039;m ashamed to admit I missed some of the early episodes, but a strange thing happened as the series progressed. I found I was growing to like the new characters in their own right, and I was enjoying their interactions and personalities. And an even stranger thing happened. My wife, a profoundly non-SF person, was also enjoying the series. (It didn&#039;t hurt getting to watch <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/character/1112487.html" title="William T. Riker">Will Riker</a> each week!) They had managed to make the show appeal to more than just the Trekkies out there.</p>
<p>The rest (of the future of the future) is history. <em>The Next Generation</em> (and the other <em>Star Trek</em> spin-offs) were not the prime-time success in Australia that they were in the USA, leading to unusual broadcast schedules.  I was often forced to watch or record episodes at midnight (or later!) &#8212; but watch them all I did. I grew to love the show, and like many people I believe it was the best of all the <em>Star Trek</em>s. Certainly I grew to feel that the crew members were part of a family, one I was almost a part of myself. I laughed with them, worried for them, and yes, even cried with them. Picard was an outstanding captain &#8212; far better than Kirk,  <a href="http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&amp;Acronym=imho&amp;Find=Find" title="In My Humble Opinion">IMHO</a>. <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/character/1112448.html" title="Worf">Worf</a> taught us all about &#034;honor&#034;. And Data was a wonderful character for the scriptwriters to &#034;play&#034; with.</p>
<p>But he never did supplant Spock as one of my favorite non-humans of all time.</p>
<p><i>Peter Watson is old enough to remember watching the original </i>Star Trek<i> at home in Australia in glorious black-and-white. As a software engineer he gets to hang out with other people who know something about </i>Star Trek<i>.  Visit his Web site at <A HREF = "http://www.peter-watson.net/" TITLE="Peter-Watson.net">http://www.peter-watson.net/</A></i></p>
<hr align="left" width="20%" />
<p>Also in the <A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/tng-20" TITLE="Special Feature -- TNG at 20">TNG at 20</a> series:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=187" title="T-Minus One Week and Counting">T-Minus One Week and Counting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=188" title="To Everything, There Is a Season">To Everything, There Is a Season</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=191" title="The Human Condition">The Human Condition</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=190" title="The Voyage Continues">The Voyage Continues</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=192" title="But Don't Take My Word For It">But Don&#039;t Take My Word For It</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=193" title="A Good Day to Die">A Good Day to Die</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/24/tng-20-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TNG at 20: To Everything, There Is a Season</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/23/tng-20-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/23/tng-20-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of Both Worlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complete series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darmok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Famke Janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fan Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futures End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Borg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perfect Mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reunification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tapestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasha Yar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Next Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Arrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG at 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trek Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trek Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yesterdays Enterprise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/23/tng-20-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Star Trek: The Next Generation was the first Star Trek to enjoy a full, cancellation-free run. This October 2nd, its 176 episodes will be available in a new box set (watch the trailer, read the press release). Though $40/season is a fair deal, $278.89, after shipping, is still no small amount of change. And, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em> was the first <em>Star Trek</em> to enjoy a full, cancellation-free run.  This October 2nd, its 176 episodes will be available in a new box set (<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=2306903" title="Star Trek TNG Complete Series DVD trailer">watch the trailer</a>, <a href="http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Star-Trek-Generation-Complete-Series-Press-Release/8110" title="Star Trek TNG Complete Series DVD press release">read the press release</a>).  Though $40/season is a fair deal, <a href="http://www.dvdpricesearch.com/cgi-bin/dvdcalc2?cmd=calc&amp;tmpCart=73783" title="Star Trek TNG price search">$278.89, after shipping</a>, is still no small amount of change.  And, as <a href="http://www.treknation.com/" title="The Trek Nation">Trek Nation</a> has been recently reminding us with their <a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/index.shtml" title="Trek Nation Reviews">retro reviews</a>, some entire seasons of <em>TNG</em> have not aged well.</p>
<p>There are many ways to separate the wheat from the chaff.  Various <a href="http://store.startrek.com/category/multiple/11+35" title="Star Trek online store">fan collectives</a> offer thematically-related content, so if you like <a href="http://store.startrek.com/product/show/74" title="Time Travel Fan Collective">time travel</a> or <a href="http://store.startrek.com/product/show/75" title="Q Fan Collective">Q</a>, you&#039;re bound to be satisfied &#8212; unless you dwell on what these packages miss, such as &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/VOY/episode/68934.html" title="Future's End, Part I">Future&#039;s</a> <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/VOY/episode/68936.html" title="Future's End, Part II">End</a>&#034;.  For my money, <a href="http://store.startrek.com/product/show/93" title="The Jean-Luc Picard Collection">The Jean-Luc Picard Collection</a> is the best value, as I prefer episodes that offer not an anomaly of the week, but significant, focused character development. &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68588.html" title="Tapestry">Tapestry</a>&#034;, &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68510.html" title="Darmok">Darmok</a>&#034;, and &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68556.html" title="The Inner Light">The Inner Light</a>&#034; are worth their weight in latinum, and with the former two both coming from <a href="http://www.treknation.com/episodes/tng/#season5" title="TNG Season Five episode guide">season five</a>, perhaps that is the series&#039; best season.  Other fifth-season episodes &#034;<a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/i_borg.shtml" title="I, Borg parody">I, Borg</a>&#034;, &#034;<a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/the_perfect_mate.shtml" title="The Perfect Mate parody">The Perfect Mate</a>&#034; (another Picard episode, and one which first unites Patrick Stewart with Famke Janssen, prior to their <em>X-Men</em> team-up), Spock&#039;s return in the two-part &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68522.html" title="Unification, Part I">Unification</a>&#034;, and the first half of &#034;<a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68558.html" title="Time's Arrow, Part I">Time&#039;s Arrow</a>&#034; supports this theory.</p>
<p>But only with the new, complete DVD collection can you get all the above along with gems like &#034;<a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/the_best_of_worlds_part_one.shtml" title="The Best of Both Worlds, Part I parody">The Best</a> of <a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/the_best_of_worlds_part_one.shtml" title="The Best of Both Worlds, Part II parody">Both Worlds</a>&#034;, &#034;<a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/yesterdays_enterprise.shtml" title="Yesterday's Enterprise parody">Yesterday&#039;s Enterprise</a>&#034;, and &#034;<a href="http://www.treknation.com/reviews/fiver_tng/relics.shtml" title="Relics parody">Relics</a>&#034; &#8212; so if you have money to burn, take the good with the bad and splurge on all seven seasons (plus exclusive features and documentaries).  But if you don&#039;t, then what season (or fan collective) do <em>you</em> recommend, and for what episodes?</p>
<hr align="left" width="20%" />
<p>Also in the <A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/tng-20" TITLE="Special Feature -- TNG at 20">TNG at 20</a> series:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=187" title="T-Minus One Week and Counting">T-Minus One Week and Counting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=189" title="Where, Oh Where, Has My Little Spock Gone?">Where, Oh Where, Has My Little Spock Gone?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=191" title="The Human Condition">The Human Condition</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=190" title="The Voyage Continues">The Voyage Continues</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=192" title="But Don't Take My Word For It">But Don&#039;t Take My Word For It</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=193" title="A Good Day to Die">A Good Day to Die</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/23/tng-20-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TNG at 20: T-Minus One Week and Counting</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/22/tng-20-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/22/tng-20-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1966]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outer space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sputnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Next Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNG at 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/22/tng-20-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 4th marks the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik. A year after Russia beat America into space, the White House responded with a document, Introduction to Outer Space, urging America to win this race: The first of these factors is the compelling urge of man to explore and to discover, the thrust of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 4th marks <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9036482" title="Happy Birthday, Sputnik!">the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik</a>.  A year after Russia beat America into space, the White House responded with a document, <a href="http://www.fas.org/spp/guide/usa/intro1958.html" title="Introduction to Outer Space"><em>Introduction to Outer Space</em></a>, urging America to win this race:</p>
<blockquote><p> The first of these factors is the compelling urge of man to explore and to discover, the thrust of curiosity that leads men to try to go where no one has gone before. Most of the surface of the earth has now been explored and men now turn on the exploration of outer space as their next objective.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#034;Where no one has gone before&#8230;&#034; <a href="http://www.roddenberry.com/?action=site.gene" title="Roddenberry Productions">Gene Roddenberry</a> took these words to heart, and less than a decade later, he went there &#8212; and brought the world with him.</p>
<p>His original <a href="http://www.startrek.com/" title="StarTrek.com"><em>Star Trek</em></a>, which <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/editorials/article/25215.html" title="Star Trek at 40">turned 40 last year</a>, may not initially have been a commercial success; but its successor, true to its title, inspired the next generation of television viewers to look up.  The passion the <em>Star Trek</em> franchise has stirred in its audience has proven timeless, and its impact on not just our popular culture, but on our scientific progress, is immeasurable.  <a href="http://www.trekunited.com/community/lofiversion/index.php/t1191.html" title="Investors in commercial space flight industry anonymously contribute $3-million to TrekUnited">One space industry executive wrote</a>, &#034;We are in the commercial space flight industry and would like to testify that at least one out of two of all the actual entrepreneurs involved in this industry has been inspired by <em>Star Trek</em>.&#034;</p>
<p>Though Kirk, Spock, and McCoy marked the beginning, it was Picard, Riker, Data, and company that cemented the franchise in our hearts and souls.  And we here at Showbits cannot fail to observe the beginning of that golden era.</p>
<p>September 28th marks twenty years since <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em> first aired.  To commemorate this historic anniversary, we&#039;ll be blogging about <em>Star Trek</em> every day this week, culminating on Friday.  We&#039;ll be providing news, retrospectives, analyses, and more.  They&#039;ll be fun, nostalgic, thought-provoking, and who knows what else.  So please join us on this wagon train to the stars&#8230; The sky&#039;s the limit!</p>
<hr align="left" width="20%" />
<p>Also in the <A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/tng-20" TITLE="Special Feature -- TNG at 20">TNG at 20</a> series:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=188" title="To Everything, There Is a Season">To Everything, There Is a Season</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=189" title="Where, Oh Where, Has My Little Spock Gone?">Where, Oh Where, Has My Little Spock Gone?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=191" title="The Human Condition">The Human Condition</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=190" title="The Voyage Continues">The Voyage Continues</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=192" title="But Don't Take My Word For It">But Don&#039;t Take My Word For It</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.showbits.net/index.php?p=193" title="A Good Day to Die">A Good Day to Die</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/09/22/tng-20-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quarterly Review</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/08/08/1982/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/08/08/1982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blade Runner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan the Barbarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan the Destroyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Crystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Barrymore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Terrestrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hall of Volta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Henson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvel Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael J Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MST3K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muppets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip K Dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricardo Montalban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RiffTrax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert E Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrath of Khan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/08/08/1982/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The June/July issue of Geek Monthly has a cover story on what a great year 1982 was for geeks. We may not have noticed it at the time, but it is astonishing what a plethora of great sci-fi films came out all in that one year. Unfortunately, some of these films I did not see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The June/July issue of <a href="http://www.geekmonthly.com/" title="Geek Monthly"><em>Geek Monthly</em></a> has a cover story on what a great year 1982 was for geeks.  We may not have noticed it at the time, but it is astonishing what a plethora of great sci-fi films came out all in that one year.  Unfortunately, some of these films I did not see upon their initial release, and some are not as great today as they were 25 years ago.  Nonetheless, here in brief is my rundown of their list:</p>
<p><em>Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</em><br />
Considered &#034;the zenith of the <em>Trek</em> feature films&#034;, I agree this film began the even-numbered successes that persisted until <em>Nemesis</em>.  The <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/episode/68708.html" title="Space Seed">tie-in to the original series</a>, <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/character/1071396.html" title="Khan Noonien Singh">Ricardo Montalban as the villain</a>, and the ending were all fantastic facets&#8230; but for all that, I still think I prefer the more lighthearted <em>The Voyage Home</em>.</p>
<p><span id="more-159"></span><em>Blade Runner</em><br />
I confess that the one time I tried watching this was a decade ago and I just couldn&#039;t get into it; I turned it off probably before it got interesting. (Confession #2: I was bored by Tolkien&#039;s books, too.)  Without lambasting me, could someone tell me what I&#039;m missing?</p>
<p><em>TRON</em><br />
What more can I say about this film, other than <a href="/index.php?p=42" title="End of line.">my previous recollections</a> and my own <a href="/index.php?p=147" title="Now For Some Real User Power">25th anniversary commemoration</a>?  Though I do wish I could combine this film with one of <a href="http://www.mst3kinfo.com/" title="Mystery Science Theater 3000">my favorite geek shows</a>:</p>
<p>In 2004, I was witness to a theatrical screening of <em>TRON</em> as <A HREF = "http://www.chrishanel.com/" TITLE="Christopher Hanel">Chris Hanel</A> (occasionally of <a href="http://www.theforce.net/" title="TheForce.net">TheForce.net</a> and <a href="http://www.trudang.com/" title="The Truly Dangerous Company">The Truly Dangerous Company</a>; now of <a href="http://www.geekza.com/?page_id=2" title="Geekza">Geekza</a>) and his cronies performed a live <em>MST3K</em> lampoon.  I&#039;ve been wanting to get my hands on that script ever since.  Considering his <a href="http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=8230" title="Geekza episode archive">podcast</a> recently interviewed <a href="http://www.michaeljnelson.com/home/" title="Michael J. Nelson">Mike Nelson</a> of <A HREF = "/index.php?p=40" TITLE="The Return of Statler and Waldorf">RiffTrax</A>, I&#039;d think some sort of collaborative MP3 should be possible.</p>
<p><em>The Dark Crystal</em><br />
I haven&#039;t seen this film since my age could be counted without taking off my shoes.  My parents thought this Muppet movie perfectly palatable to a young, impressionable mind (similar to their misinformed opinion on <em>Watership Down</em>: &#034;Oh, a cartoon about talking bunnies!&#034;).  In hindsight, <em>The Dark Crystal</em> may&#039;ve been one of the films that engendered my preference for dark, edgy stories.  It&#039;s a wonder my mother didn&#039;t worry when her third-grade son brought home from the library every book he could find on vampires and werewolves; nowadays, that&#039;d be grounds to see the school counselor. (Course, in my day, schools didn&#039;t <em>have</em> counselors&#8230;)</p>
<p>Look for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_the_Dark_Crystal" title="The Power of the Dark Crystal on Wikipedia">a sequel</a> next year.</p>
<p><em>E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial</em><br />
Another movie not seen in a score of years &#8212; though anything scored by local-boy-done-good <a href="http://www.johnwilliamscomposer.com/" title="John Williams Official Site">John Williams</a> is okay by me.  Funny that Drew Barrymore went on to become a household name (and <a href="/index.php?p=132" title="Read All About It">one of my co-stars</a>); whereas Elliott did not.  Who even knows the actor&#039;s name? (Psst &#8212; it&#039;s Henry Thomas.)  Too bad &#8212; he&#039;s still quite <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001794/" title="Henry Thomas on IMDb">a prolific actor</a>.</p>
<p><em>Conan the Barbarian</em><br />
I&#039;ve not read Robert E. Howard&#039;s original pulp series, nor the Marvel comic books, both of which this Arnold Schwarzenegger film is based on.  But I&#039;ll be in the minority of preferring the film&#039;s sequel, <em>Conan the Destroyer</em>, to the original; I found the follow-up to be a more classic Dungeons &amp; Dragons romp.</p>
<p>Either way, the film&#039;s success warranted slapping its name on an otherwise unrelated gaming property.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conan:_Hall_of_Volta" title="Conan on Wikipedia">Conan: Hall of Volta</a> supplied many happy hours of <a href="http://www.a2central.com/portal/" title="A2Central.com">Apple II gaming</a>.</p>
<p>Also featured in <em>Geek Monthly</em> but which I&#039;ve never seen:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Poltergeist</em></li>
<li><em>Cat People</em></li>
<li><em>The Thing</em></li>
<li><em>The Road Warrior</em></li>
</ul>
<p>And other anniversaries this year:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Close Encounters of the Third Kind</em>: 30 years</li>
<li><em>Masters of the Universe</em>: 20 years</li>
<li><em>Robocop</em>: 20 years</li>
<li><em><A HREF = "http://www.showbits.net/tng-20/" TITLE="TNG at 20">Star Trek: The Next Generation</em>: 20 years</A></li>
</ul>
<p>What films or occasions are you observing this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/08/08/1982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just an old country doctor&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.showbits.net/2007/01/20/deforest-kelley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.showbits.net/2007/01/20/deforest-kelley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gagne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crucible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeForrest Kelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Doohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provenance of Shadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showbits.net/2007/01/20/deforest-kelley/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, I finally tackled Crucible: Provenance of Shadows, the first in a trilogy of books that independently examines each of the three main characters of Star Trek: The Original Series. At three times the length of most Trek novels, Crucible initially intimidated me &#8212; but with the Spock&#039;s book now out, and Kirk&#039;s due [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, I finally tackled <a title="Crucible: McCoy" href="http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=24&#038;pid=520135"><em>Crucible: Provenance of Shadows</em></a>, the first in a trilogy of books that independently examines each of the three main characters of <em>Star Trek: The Original Series</em>.  At three times the length of most <em>Trek</em> novels, <em>Crucible</em> initially intimidated me &#8212; but with the <a title="Crucible: Spock" href="http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=24&#038;pid=520838">Spock&#039;s book</a> now out, and <a title="Crucible: Kirk" href="http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=24&#038;pid=522277">Kirk&#039;s</a> due next month, it felt time to get cracking on McCoy&#039;s installment.</p>
<p>I&#039;m enjoying the book thoroughly, and I&#039;ll go into more detail why once I&#039;ve finished it.  But I thought it worth writing today in memory of <a title="Biography: DeForest Kelley" href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/features/specials/article/4203.html">the actor who brought Bones to life</a>, as today would&#039;ve been his 87th birthday.  It was a sad day eight years ago when DeForest Kelley was the first of the Enterprise&#039;s crew to pass beyond the galactic barrier, where he&#039;s since been joined by <a title="James Doohan" href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/cast/69073.html">James Doohan</a>.  But as I read <em>Crucible</em>, it brings Mr. Kelley&#039;s performance back to life in a very real way.  It&#039;s probably expected of today&#039;s <em>Trek</em> actors, but I doubt forty-one years ago, the crew of the Enterprise&#039;s maiden voyage realized they would be immortalized, with countless untold stories yet to be discovered and explored, in novels, comics, films, and fiction for decades to come.  I can&#039;t imagine how different a scape our imaginations would be, had any other actor come to personify Leonard McCoy.  I hope novels such as <em>Crucible</em> continue to do his legacy proud.</p>
<p>I regret that I&#039;m not a bigger fan of westerns, as it seems that genre is where Mr. Kelley can most be seen outside the realm of <em>Star Trek</em>.  Can anyone recommend some of his films?</p>
<p>Fortunately, he was more than an actor, as today I was delighted to discover a trilogy of <em>Star Trek</em> poems written by the late doctor.  &#034;<a title="The Big Bird's Dream" href="http://mayclaire.res-alian.com/memoriam/dkelley/poem.html">The Big Bird&#039;s Dream</a>&#034; presents a rhyming narrative of <a title="Gene Roddenberry" href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/editorials/article/31455.html">Gene Roddenberry</a> (whose nickname was &#034;The Great Bird of the Galaxy&#034;) and his efforts to realize his screenplay dream.  Be sure to follow the links to the two sequel poems as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.showbits.net/2007/01/20/deforest-kelley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.054 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.showbits.net @ 2012-02-11 00:52:00 -->
